The are three major classifications of substance knows as acids and bases
The Arrhenius definition states that an acid produces \(H^+\) in solution and a base produced \(OH^-\).
This was proposed by Svante Arrhenius in 1883
In acid-base chemistry, the hydrogen ion is often written as proton,\(H^+\) but it usually exists in a hydrated form such as \(H_3O^+\), \(H_5O_2^+\), \(H_7O_3^+\) (these are collectively called the hydronium ion)
\[ H^+ + 3H_2O \rightarrow H_3O^+ + 2H_2O \rightleftharpoons H_5O_2^+ + H_2O \rightleftharpoons H_7O_3^+ \]
The Arrhenius Theory of Acids and Bases
Arrhenius acids are substances which produce hydrogen ions in solution.
Arrhenius bases are substances which produce hydroxide ions in solution.
This is the simplest acid-base theory
This theory successfully describes how acids and bases neutralize each other
There are issues with why certain acids and bases aren't predicted to be acids and bases according to this theory
The Brønsted-Lowry Theory of Acids and Bases
A Brønsted-Lowry acid is a proton (hydrogen ion) donor.
A Brønsted-Lowry base is a proton (hydrogen ion) acceptor.
In this theory, acids release protons while bases accept those protons
\[ F^-(aq)+H_2O(l) \rightleftharpoons HF(aq)+OH-(aq) \]
Base dissociation:
\[ B(aq)+H_2O(l) \rightleftharpoons HB^+(aq)+OH^-(aq) \]
\[ K_b=\frac{[HB^+][OH^-]}{[B]} \]
Conjugate Acids and Bases
One consequence of these equilibria is that every acid (\(HA\)) has a conjugate base (\(A^-\)) and vice-versa
For a given acid or base, these equilibria are linked by the water dissociation equilibrium
\[ H_2O(l) \rightleftharpoons H^+(aq)+OH^-(aq) \]
\[ K_w=[H^+][OH^-]=1.00\times 10^{-14}\;\text{at}\;25^\circ C \]
Strong and Weak Acids and Bases
Acids and bases that completely dissociate are strong
\[ HClO_4(aq)\rightarrow H^+(aq)+ClO_4^-(aq) \]
Note that the arrow implies that the reaction runs to completion
Weak acids and bases dissociate only slightly - they exist mostly undissociated
\[ HC2H_3O_2(aq)+H_2O(l) \rightleftharpoons C_2H_3O_2^-(aq) + H_3O^+(aq) \]
The strength of a conjugate acid/base varies inversely with the strength of its parent acid or base
A Common Misconception
It is a common misconception that strong acids and bases have weak conjugates.
For a strong acid or base, \(K \gg 1\)
Since \(K_aK_b=K_w\), if \(K_a\gg 1\) then \(K_b \lt K_w\) which is weaker than water
Hence, strong acids and bases do not have conjugates, rather they produce spectator ions which are not acid or basic but neutral.
A Simple Rule
Linus Pauling developed a rule for strong acids
For neutral oxyacids, they can be classified as strong is the number of oxygen atoms exceeds the number of hydrogen atoms by two or more
Strong: \(HClO_4\) and \(HClO_3\)
Weak: \(HClO_2\) and \(HClO\)
For weak acids, the relative strength depends on the difference in oxygen-hydrogen numbers and on the electronegativity of the central atom
Polyprotic Acids
Acids that can donate more than one proton are called polyprotic - \(H_2SO_4\).
While the first proton might come off easily, it get harder and harder for subsequent protons
In fact, the \(pK_a\) of the sequential protons are separated by about 5 pH units
For phosphoric acid, the \(pK_a\)'s are 2.15, 7.20, and 12.35.
Amphoteric Compounds
Amphoteric substance are those compounds that can act as either and acid or a base (e.g. water)
When an acid is dissociating in water, the water is acting as a base
When a base is dissociating in water, the water is acting as an acid
The strongest acid we can make in water is \(H^+(aq)\) and the strongest base we can make in water is \(OH^-(aq)\).
Solvent Leveling
Solvent leveling occurs when a strong acid is placed in a solvent
Because the strong acid donates its proton to the solvent. the strongest possible acid is the conjugate acid of the solvent
This means that the strength of acids such as \(HCl\) and \(HBr\) cannot be differentiated in water
To determine the strengths of these acids, we must typically work in non-aqueous solvents
Nonaqueous Solutions
The Brønsted theory encompases any type of solventthat can donate and accept \(H^+\)
The strength of an acid or base varies depending on the solvent
Because ammonia is a basic solvent, it enhanced the acidity and suppresses the basicity of substances dissolved in it
Strong acids that are levelled in water have different acid strengths in acidic solvents such as \(HF\) or anhydrous acetic acid
Acidity in Nonaqueous Solvents
It is difficult to quantify precisely the acidity and basicity in nonaqueous solvents
One good relative measure is the Hammett acidity function, \(H_0\)
\[ H_0=pK_a + \log \left( \frac{\left[ \text{base} \right]}{\left[ \text{conjugate acid} \right]} \right) \]
For non-aqueous solvents, or for acidic or basic compounds dissolved in solvents that do not themselves dissociate, \(H_0\) is a rough measure of the pH of the solvent or compound in question
Anhydrous \(HF\) and \(H_2SO_4\) have \(H_0\) value of approximately \(-10\) and \(-12\) respectively
Superacids and Superbases
The term superacid was originally coined by James Bryant Conant in 1927 to describe acids that were stronger than conventional mineral acids
George A. Olah prepared the so-called magic acid, so-named for its ability to attack hydrocarbons, by mixing antimony pentafloride (\(SbF_5\)) and fluorosulfonic acid (\(FSO_3H\))
The name was coined after a candle was placed in the mixture and the candle dissolved showing it had been protonated.
Examples of Superacids and Superbases
Superacids are useful in reactions such as the isomerization of alkanes
Industrially, anhydrous acid-exchanged zeolites, which are superacid catalysts, are used on a massive scale to isomerize hydrocarbons in the processing of crude oil into gasoline
Superbases such as lithium diethylamide (\(LiNEt_2\)), alkyllithium compounds (\(RLi\)), and Grignard reagents (\(RMgX\)) are usefulin a broad range of organic reactions
\(LiNEt_2\) deprotonates \(C-H\) bonds to generate reactive carbanions. \(RLi\) and \(RMgX\) are powerful nucleophiles
Carbon Acid Acidities in \(pK_a\) in DMSO
name
formula
\(pK_a\)
Methane
\(CH_4\)
\(\sim 56\)
Propene
\(C_3H_6\)
\(\sim 44\)
Benzene
\(C_6H_6\)
\(\sim 43\)
Acetylene
\(C_2H_2\)
\(25\)
Cyclopentadiene
\(C_5H_6\)
\(18\)
Acid-Base Equilibria in Molten Salts
When a solid salt melts, it forms a solution of the cations and anions
For example \(KOH\) melts at a temperature of \(400^circ C\) and dissociates into \(K^+\) and \(OH^-\) ions
These ions can act as a solvent for chemical reactions
Because of the autodissociation of the \(OH^-\) ion, water is always present in a molten \(KOH\) flux
Therefore, water is the stronges acid that can exist
The conjugate base of the solvent, \(O^{2-}\), is the strongest base
Therefore, a "wet" flux is more acidic while a "dry" flux is more basic
Mixture of \(NaOH\) and \(KOH\) are relatively low melting (\(\approx 200^\circ C\)) and can be used as solvents for crystallizing a variety of basic oxides
The Lewis Theory of Acids and Bases
A Lewis acid is an electron pair acceptor.
A Lewis base is an electron pair donor.
The Lewis classification of acids an bases is broader than the Brønsted-Lowry definition
It encompasses many more substances
Example 4.1
Identify the Lewis Acid and Lewis Base in the following examples
There are three determing factors in the Lewis acid strength of a metal ion:
The higher positive charge on the metal, the more acidic it is
The smaller the atomic radius of the metal ion, the more acidic it is
For transition metal ions, more electronegative metals tend to make stronger Lewis acids
Molecules with five coordinte geometries are typically strong Lewis acids because when they accept another pair of electrons they form an octahedral molecule or ion
Lewis Bases Stabilize High Oxidation States
It turns out that acids tend to stabilize low oxidation states while bases tend to stabilize high oxidation states
\(Mn\) is stable in the +4 oxidation state in \(K_2MnF_6\) where it is surrounded by six basic \(F^-\) anions
The highest stable neutral fluoride of \(Mn\) is \(MnF_3\)
\(MnF_4\) spontaneously decomposes to generate fluorine
Oxide is a Better Base than Fluoride
\(Mn\) can lose all its valence electrons to form \(Mn^{7+}\) in the permanganate ion, \(MnO_4^-\)
The 7+ oxidation state is stabilized by coordination to four \(O^{2-}\) ions
Because of its 2- charge, \(O^{2-}\) is a stronger base and better ion for stabilizing high oxidation states than \(F^-\)
The highest oxidation states in the transition metals is usually reached with oxide not fluoride even though fluorine is more electronegative
Hard and Soft Acids and Bases
The "hard and soft (Lewis) acids and bases" (HSAB) theory is widely used for explaining stability of compounds, reaction mechanisms, and reaction pathways
Hard Acids and Bases
"Hard" acids and bases have a high charge (positive for acids, negative for bases) to ionic radius ratio along with higher oxidation states
Hard acids interact with bases primarily through ionic bonding and they are not very polarizable
Ex. \(H^+\), \(O^{2-}\), \(OH^-\), \(F^-\), \(Fe^{3+}\), and \(Al^{3+}\)
Soft Acids and Bases
"Soft" acids and bases have a low charg to radius ratio, with low oxidation states
They are normally larger ions that are polarizable
Soft acids and bases have significant covalent bonding component when they interact
Examples: \(I^-\), \(S^{2-}\), \(Ag^+\)
Some acids and bases are classified as intermediate (neither hard nor soft) such as trimethylborane, \(Fe^{2+}\), and \(Pb^{2+}\)
Hard Soft Trends for Acids (Left) and Bases (Right)
Like Binds with Like
Hards acids iteract more strongly with hard bases than with soft and vice-versa
Thus, the most stable complexes are hard-hard and soft-soft interactions
Acid Classification Based on \(\log K_1\) of the Compound
fluoride
chloride
bromide
iodide
classification
\( Fe^{3+} \)
6.0
1.4
0.5
-
Hard
\( Pb^{2+} \)
1.3
0.9
1.1
1.3
Intermediate
\( Ag^+ \)
0.4
3.3
4.7
6.6
Soft
\( Hg^{2+} \)
1.0
6.7
8.9
12.9
Soft
Gold - The Softest Metal Ion
\(Au^+\) is the softest metal ion
It forms stable complexes with phosphines and \(CN^-\), but not with hard bases such as \(O^{2-}\) or \(F^-\)
The affinity of \(Au^+\) for the soft base \(CN^-\) is high
The resulting \([Au(CN)_2]^-\) complex is so stable that gold can be oxidized by oxygen in the air:
\[ \begin{array}{ll} 4Au(s)+8CN^-(aq) \\ +O_2(g)+2H_2O(l) \end{array} \rightarrow 4[Au(CN)_2]^-(aq) + 4OH^-(aq) \]
The \(Au^{3+}\) is a harder acid and can form complexes with harder bases such as \(H_2O\) and amines
\(AuI\) (soft-soft) is stable but \(AuI_3\) (hard-soft) is unknown
\(AuF\) has never been isolated but \(AuF_3\) (hard-hard) is stable.
The ECW Model
Classification of Lewis acids and bases as hard and soft is useful qualitative approach to rationalize their behavior
The ECW Model is a more quantitative model that describes and predicts the strength of Lewis acid - Lewis base interactions
The strength of the interaction is measured as the enthalpy of adduct formation, \(\Delta H\)
\[ -\Delta H=E_AE_B + C_AC_B+W \]
where \(E\) is the electrostatic contribution, \(C\) is the covalent contribution, and \(W\) is the constant energy for cleavage of a dimeric acid or base.
Example of \(W\)
For \([Rh(CO)_2Cl]_2, determine cleavage of the dimer
\[ \frac{1}{2}[Rh(CO)_2Cl]_2\;\;\;\;\; W=-10.39\,\frac{kcal}{mol} \]
For the H-bonding acid \((CF_3)_3COH\), \(W\) is the enthalpy needed to cleave the internal hydrogen bonding
\(C_5H_5N\) with bis(hexafloroacetyacetonato)copper (II) (\(Cu(HFacac)_2\)) Example
In this case, \(W=0\) since neither the acid nor the base is a dimer
The \(E\) and \(C\) parameters can be found in various places include the Wikipedia page of the ECW Model
\(E_A=1.82\) and \(E_B=1.78\)
\(C_A=2.86\) and \(C_B=3.54\)
Now we can calculate our value
\[ -\Delta H = E_AE_B+C_AC_B+W = (1.82)(1.78)+(2.86)(3.54)=13.4\frac{kcal}{mol} \]
So, \(\Delta H=-13.4\frac{kcal}{mol}\) and the experimental value for this is \(-13.4\frac{kcal}{mol}\).
Comparison with Experiment
While in our previous example, the calculated and the experimental values were the same, that is not always the case
The calculated value for \(Me_3B\) with \(Me_3N\) is larger than experimental
These discrepancies ae attributed to the amount of steric effect in the actual system - steric effect between the methyl group in \(Me_3B\) and \(Me_3N\)
When \(\pi\) bonding contributes to the measured enthalpy, the enthalpy calculaed from \(E\) and \(C\) will be less than the measured value
The difference gives a measure of the extent of the \(\pi\) bonding contribution