Consider a sample of two gases filling two chambers in a single container
After we remove the barrier and they mix isothermally, the partial pressures of the two gases will drop by a factor of 2 while the volume will double
Enthalpy of Mixing
Assuming an ideal gas, let's look at the change in enthalpy of mixing
The total enthalpy of mixing is \( \Delta H_{mix} = \Delta H_A + \Delta H_B \)
Since the enthalpy change is for an isothermal expansion we know that \( \Delta H_{mix}=0 \)
This will be true for ideal mixtures
Entropy of Mixing
The entropy change due to the isothermal mixing is again the sum of the isothermal expansions of the two gases
Entropy changes for isothermal expansions are easy to calculate for ideal gases
\[ \Delta S = nR \ln \left( \frac{V_2}{V_1} \right) \]
If we use \(V_A\) and \(V_B\) for the initial volumes of gases A and B then the total volume is \(V_A+V_B\) so
\[ \Delta S_{mix} = n_A R \ln \left(\frac{V_A+V_B}{V_A}\right) + n_B R \ln \left(\frac{V_A+V_B}{V_B}\right) \]
Final Expression of the Entropy of Mixing
\( \Delta S_{mix} = n_A R \ln \left(\frac{V_A+V_B}{V_A}\right) + n_B R \ln \left(\frac{V_A+V_B}{V_B}\right) \)
Note that (\(\chi_A\) is the mole fraction of A)
\[ \frac{V_{tot}}{V_A} = \frac{V_A+V_B}{V_A} = \frac{1}{\chi_A} = \frac{n_A+n_B}{n_A} = \frac{n_{tot}}{n_A} \]
Plugging in our mole fractions
\[ \Delta S_{mix} = n_{tot}\chi_A R \ln \left(\frac{1}{\chi_A}\right) + n_{tot}\chi_B R \ln \left(\frac{1}{\chi_B}\right) \]
\[ \Delta S_{mix} = n_{tot} R \left[ -\chi_A \ln \left(\chi_A\right) - \chi_B \ln \left( \chi_B \right) \right] \]
Here we see that mixing at any level always has \(\Delta G_{mix}\lt 0\) and therefore it is always spontaneous - Mixing is always a spontaneous process for an ideal solution
Partial Molar Volume
The partial molar volume of compound A in a mixture of A and B can be defined as
\[ V_A = \left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial n_A}\right)_{P,T,n_B} \]
So the total differential of \(V\) is
\[ dV = \left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial n_A}\right)_{P,T,n_B} dn_A + \left(\frac{\partial V}{\partial n_B}\right)_{P,T,n_A} dn_B = V_A dn_A + V_B dn_B \]
An Integrated Version
\[ dV = V_A dn_A + V_B dn_B \]
We can integrate this equation
\[ \begin{eqnarray}
V &=& \int_0^{n_A} V_A dn_A + \int_0^{n_B} V_B dn_B \\
&=& V_A n_A + V_B n_B
\end{eqnarray} \]
Overall, if \(\xi_i\) is the partial molar property \(X\) for component \(i\) of a mixture then the total property \(X\) for the mixture is
\[ X=\sum_i \xi_i n_i \]
Chemical Potential
Just like with the partial molar volume, we can define the partial molar Gibbs function
\[ \mu_i = \left(\frac{\partial G}{\partial n_i}\right)_{P,T,n_{j\ne i}} \]
\(\mu_i\) is called the chemical potential
The chemical potential tells ho the Gibbs function will change as the composition of the mixture changes
The chemical potential will point to the direction the system can move in order to reduce the total Gibbs function
A New Expression for the Total Gibbs Function
The total change in the Gibbs function (\(dG\)) can be calculated from
\[ dG = \left(\frac{\partial G}{\partial P}\right)_{T,n_i} dP + \left(\frac{\partial G}{\partial T}\right)_{P,n_i} dT + \sum_i \left(\frac{\partial G}{\partial n_i}\right)_{T,n_{j\ne i}} dn_i\]
We could also substitute the chemical potentials and evaluating the pressure and temperature derviates as we have done in the past
\[ dG = V\, dP-S\, dT+\sum_i \mu_i\, dn_i \]
If \(\mu_i=\left(\frac{\partial G}{\partial n_i}\right)_{P,T,n_{j\ne i}}\) and then \(dG=VdP-SdT+\sum_i \mu_idn_i\) then
\[ d\mu = VdP-SdT \]
From this we see that
\[ \left(\frac{\partial \mu}{\partial P}\right)_T=V \xrightarrow{\Delta T=0} \int_{\mu^\circ}^{\mu}d\mu = \int_{P^\circ}^P VdP\]
Defining Chemical Potentials
For substances for which the molar volume is mostly independent of pressure at constant temperature (small \(\kappa_T\)
\[ \begin{eqnarray}
\int_{\mu^\circ}^{\mu}d\mu &=& V \int_{P^\circ}^P dP \\
\mu-\mu^\circ &=& V\left(P-P^\circ\right) \\
\mu &=& \mu^\circ + V\left(P-P^\circ\right)
\end{eqnarray} \]
where \(P^\circ\) is a reference pressure and \(\mu^\circ\) is the chemical potential at the standard pressure
What About for Highly Compressible Materials?
If we have a highly compressible ideal gas we can use \(V=\frac{RT}{P}\) so that at constant temperature
\[ \int_{\mu^\circ}^\mu d\mu = RT\int_{P^\circ}^P \frac{dP}{P} \]
or
\[ \mu = \mu^\circ + RT \ln \left(\frac{P}{P^\circ}\right) \]
The Gibbs-Duhem Equation
For a system at equilibrium, the Gibbs-Duhem equation must hold
\[ \sum_i n_i\,d\mu_i =0 \]
Since \(\mu_i\) is the partial Gibbs function for component \(i\)
\[ G_{tot}=\sum_i n_i\mu_i \]
\[ dG_{tot}=\sum_i n_i\,d\mu_i + \sum_i \mu_i\,dn_i \]
Another Expression for \(dG\)
From before we know that
\[ dG=VdP-SdT+\sum_i\mu_idn_i \]
Setting this equal to the expression for \(dG_{tot}\)\(\require{cancel}\)
\[ \sum_i n_id\mu_i + \cancel{\sum_i \mu_i dn_i} = VdP-SdT+\cancel{\sum_i \mu_idn_i} \]
\[ \sum_i n_id\mu_i = VdP-SdT \]
Finishing the Derivation of the Gibbs-Duhem Equation
\[ \sum_i n_id\mu_i = VdP-SdT \]
If the system is at constant temperature and pressure then \(dP=0\) and \(dT=0\) therefore \(VdP-SdT=0\) and therefore
\[ \sum_i n_i d\mu_i=0 \]
A Binary System
For a binary system of components A and B at equilibrium
\[ \sum_i n_id\mu_i = n_Ad\mu_A + n_B d\mu_B =0 \]
\[ d\mu_B = -\frac{n_A}{n_B}d\mu_A \]
Non-Ideality in Gases - Fugacity
So far, we only have an ideal gas equation for the chemical potential
\[ \mu = \mu^\circ + RT \ln \left(\frac{P}{P^\circ}\right) \]
We often want to deal with real gases that deviate from ideal behavior
To do deal with non-ideality, we need a "fudge" factor called fugacity, \(f\)
Fugacity
Fugacity is related to pressure but contains all the deviations from ideality
\[ \mu = \mu^\circ + RT\ln \left(\frac{f}{f^\circ}\right) \]
Let's look at how \(f\) is related to \(P\)
Consider the change in the chemical potential for a one component system
\[ d\mu=VdP-SdT \therefore \left(\frac{\partial \mu}{\partial P}\right)_T=V \]
How Fugacity and Pressure are Related
Let's plug in the actual chemical potential into the derivative.
\[ \left(\frac{\partial \mu}{\partial P}\right)_T = \left\{ \frac{\partial}{\partial P} \left[ \mu^\circ + RT\ln \left(\frac{f}{f^\circ}\right) \right] \right\} \]
\[ \left(\frac{\partial \mu}{\partial P}\right)_T = RT\left[ \frac{\partial \ln(f)}{\partial P} \right]_T \stackrel{\text{from before}}{=} V \]
Multiplying by \(\frac{P}{RT}\)
\[ P\left[ \frac{\partial \ln(f)}{\partial P} \right]_T = \frac{PV}{RT} = Z \]
where \(Z\) is the compression factor
Fugacity Coefficient, \(\gamma\)
Let's derive the fugacity coefficient, \(\gamma\)
\[ f=\gamma P \]
Taking the natural log of both sides
\[ \ln f = \ln(\gamma P) = \ln \gamma + \ln P \]
\[ \ln \gamma = \ln f - \ln P \]
Let's look at the temperature dependence of the chemical potential
\[ \left[ \frac{\partial}{\partial T} \left(\frac{\mu_A-\mu_A^\circ}{RT}\right) \right]_P = \left(\frac{\partial \ln \chi_A}{\partial T}\right)_P \]
In the case of the solvent freezing, \(H_A^\circ\) is the enthalpy of the pure solvent in solid form and \(H_A\) is the enthalpy of the solvent in the liquid solution
This means that
\[ H_A^\circ - H_A = \Delta H_{fus} \]
Seperating variable and integrating
\[ \int_{T^\circ}^T \frac{\Delta H_{fus}}{RT^2}dT = \int d\,\ln \chi_A \]
where \(T^\circ\) is the freezing point of the pure solvent and \(T\) is the temperature at which the solvent will begin to solidify in the solution
Doing the Integration
After integration
\[ -\frac{\Delta H_{fus}}{R}\left(\frac{1}{T}-\frac{1}{T^\circ}\right)=\ln \chi_A \]
It is important to note that \( \frac{1}{T}-\frac{1}{T^\circ} = \frac{T^\circ-T}{TT^\circ} = \frac{\Delta T}{TT^\circ} \)
For small deviations from the pure freezing point, \(TT^\circ \approx \left(T^\circ\right)^2\)
\[ -\frac{\Delta H_{fus}}{R\left(T^\circ\right)^2}\Delta T = \ln \chi_A \]
Further Simplifications
For dilute solutions, \(\chi_A\approx 1\) and therefore \(\ln \chi_A \approx 0\) so
\[ \ln \chi_A \approx -(1-\chi_A) = -\chi_B \]
where \(\chi_B\) is the mole fraction of the solute
So we now have
\[ -\frac{\Delta H_{fus}}{R\left(T^\circ\right)^2}\Delta T = \chi_B \]
\[ \Delta T = \left(\frac{R\left(T^\circ\right)^2}{\Delta H_{fus}}\right)\chi_B \]
The Cryoscopic Constant, \(K_f\)
\[ \Delta T = \left(\frac{R\left(T^\circ\right)^2}{\Delta H_{fus}}\right)\chi_B \]
The first term on the right-hand side is a constant
\[ \frac{R\left(T^\circ\right)^2}{\Delta H_{fus}}=K_f \]
This gives us an equation that you have seen in general chemistry
\[ \Delta T = K_f \chi_B \]
Boiling Point Elevation
The same derivation that we just finished can also be done for the boiling point with the same result.
The increase in boiling point is
\[ \Delta T=K_b \chi_B \]
where
\[ \frac{R\left(T^\circ\right)^2}{\Delta H_{vap}}=K_b \]
\(K_b\) is called teh ebullioscopic constant
The Cryoscopic and Ebullioscopic Constants
Both the cryoscopic and ebullioscopic constants are generally tabulated in terms of molality as the unit of solute concentration rather than mole fraction
\[ \Delta T = K_f m \;\;\;\text{and}\;\;\; \Delta T=K_b m\]
A Selection of Cryoscopic and Ebullioscopic Constants
Substance
\(K_f\, (^\circ C\,kg\,mol^{-1})\)
\(T_f^\circ\, (^\circ C)\)
\(K_b\, (^\circ C\,kg\,mol^{-1})\)
\(T_b^\circ\, (^\circ C)\)
Water
1.86
0.0
0.51
100.0
Benzene
5.12
5.5
2.53
80.1
Ethanol
1.99
-114.6
1.22
78.4
\(\chem{CCl_4}\)
29.8
-22.3
5.02
76.8
Example 7.1
The boiling point of a solution of \(3.00\,g\) of an unknown compound in \(25.0\, g\) of \(\chem{CCl_4}\) raises the boiling point to \(81.5^\circ C\). What is the molar mass of the compound?
Vapor Pressure Lowering
For the same reason as the lowering of freezing points nad raising of boiling points, the vapor pressure of volatile solvent will be decreased due to the introduction of a solute.
In order to establish equilibrium between solvent in solution and vapor phase, the chemical potentials of the two phases must be equal
\[ \mu_{vapor} = \mu_{solvent} \]
If the solute is not volatile then the vapor will be pure solute so
\[ \mu_{vap}^\circ + RT \ln \frac{P'}{P^\circ} = \mu_A^\circ +RT\ln \chi_A \]
where \(P'\) is the vapor pressure of the solvent over the solution
Working on the Vapor Pressure
Similarly for the pure solvent in equilibrium with its vapor
\[ \mu_A^\circ = \mu_{vap}^\circ + RT \ln \frac{P_A}{P^\circ} \]
where \(P^\circ\) is the standard pressure of 1 atm, and \(P_A\) is the vapor pressure of the pure solvent.
Putting the last two equations together we find that
\[ \cancel{\mu_{vap}^\circ} + RT \ln \frac{P'}{P^\circ} = \left( \cancel{\mu_{vap}^\circ} + RT \ln \frac{P_A}{P^\circ} \right) + RT\ln \chi_A \]
\[ RT \ln \frac{P'}{P^\circ} = RT \ln \frac{P_A}{P^\circ} + RT\ln \chi_A \]
Raoult's Law
Cancelling out the \(RT\) that is in every term and rearranging
\[ \ln \frac{P'}{P^\circ} = \ln \frac{P_A}{P^\circ} + \ln \chi_A \]
\[ \ln \frac{P'}{P^\circ} - \ln \frac{P_A}{P^\circ} = \ln \chi_A \Rightarrow \ln \frac{P'}{P^\circ}\frac{P^\circ}{P_A} = \ln \frac{P'}{P_A} = \ln \chi_A \]
\[ \frac{P'}{P_A}=\chi_A \Rightarrow P'=\chi_AP_A \]
This is Raoult's Law
Example 7.2
Consider a mixture of two volatile liquids A and B. The vapor pressure of pure A is \(150\,Torr\) at some temperature, and that of pure B is \(300\,Torr\) at the same temperature. What is the total vapor pressure above a mixtire of these compounds with the mole fraction of B of \(0.600\). What is the mole fraction of B in the vapor that is in equilibrium with the liquid mixture?
Osmotic Pressure
Osmosis is a process by which a solvent can pass through a semi-permeable membrane from an area of low solute concentration to a region of high solute concentration
The osmotic pressure is the pressure that when exeted on the region of high solute concentration will halt the process of osmosis
The magnitude of the osmotic pressure can be understood by examining the chemical potential of a pure solvent and that of the solvent in a solution
Chemical Potentials in Osmosis
The chemical potential of the solvent in the solution is given by
\[ \mu_A = \mu_A^\circ +RT \ln \chi_A \]
Since \(\chi_A\le 1\), the chemical potential of the solvent in a solution is always lower than in a pure solvent
To prevent osmosis, something must be done to raise the chemical potential of the solvent in the solution
This can be done by applying pressure (\(\pi\)) to the solution
\[ \mu_A^\circ(P)=\mu_A(\chi_B,+\pi) \]
Solving for the Pressure
We already know that the chemical potential of the solvent in the solution is reduced by an amount given by
\[ \mu_A^\circ - \mu_A = RT\ln \chi_A \]
The increase in chemical potential due to the application of excess pressure is given by
\[ \mu(P+\pi)=\mu(P) + \int_P^{P+\pi} \left(\frac{\partial \mu}{\partial P}\right)_T dP \]
Simplifying The Expression
We already know that \( \left(\frac{\partial \mu}{\partial P}\right)_T=V \)
Combining some equations
\[ -RT\ln \chi_A = \int_P^{P+\pi}V\,dP \]
If the molar volume of the solvent is independent of pressure
\[ -RT\ln \chi_A = V \left. P\right|_P^{P+\pi} = V\pi \]
Further Simplifications
We have already seen that if \(\chi_A\approx 1\) then
\[ \ln \chi_A \approx -(1-\chi_A)=-\chi_B \]
So, for dilute solutions
\[ \chi_B RT=V\pi \]
\[ \pi = \frac{\chi_BRT}{V} \]
For cases where \(n_B \ll n_A\)
\[ \pi =\left[B\right]RT \]
Solubility
The maximum solubility of a solute can be determined using the same methods used in the colligative properties.
The chemical potential of the solute in a liquid solution
\[ \mu_{B}(solution) = \mu_B^\circ(liquid)+RT\ln \chi_B \]
If this chemical potential is lower than that of a pure solid solute, the solute will dissolve.
The point of saturation is when the chemical potential of the solute in the solute is equal to that of the pure solid solute.
The Saturation Point
Let's start by setting those chemical potentials equal
\[ \mu_B^\circ(solid)=\mu_B^\circ(liquid)+RT\ln \chi_B \]
We are interested in the mole fraction
\[ \ln \chi_B = \frac{\mu_B^\circ(solid)-\mu_B^\circ(liquid)}{RT} \]
The numerator is the molar Gibbs function of fusion, so
\[ \ln \chi_B = \frac{-\Delta G_{fus}^\circ}{RT} \]
Let's take the derivative of out \(\ln \chi_B\) equation with respect to T at constant P
\[ \left(\frac{\partial \ln \chi_B}{\partial T}\right)_P = \frac{1}{R}\frac{\Delta H_{fus}}{T^2} \]
Let's Separate the Variables and Integrate
Let's separate the variables and integrate
\[ \int_0^{\ln \chi_B} d\,\ln \chi_B = \frac{1}{R} \int_{T_f}^T \frac{\Delta H_{fus}\,dT}{T^2} \]
\[ \ln \chi_B = \frac{\Delta H_{fus}}{R} \left(\frac{1}{T_f}-\frac{1}{T} \right) \]
Non-Ideality in Solutions - Activity
So far we have dealt primarily ideal solutions
Real solutions deviate rom ideal bahavior
In the case of gases we used fugacity to account for ideality
In the case of real solutes we use activity
The activity of a solute is related to its concentration by
\[ a_B = \gamma \frac{m_B}{m^\circ} \]
Activity
\[ a_B=\gamma \frac{m_B}{m^\circ} \]
\(\gamma\) is the activity coefficient
\(m_B\) is the molality of the solute
\(m^\circ\) is unit molality
We can add activity to our chemical potential
\[ \mu_B=\mu_B^\circ + RT \ln a_B \]
The measurements of the activity coefficients depend on temperature, pressure, and concentration
Activity Coefficients for Ionic Solutes
For an ionic substance that dissociates when dissolved
\[ \chem{MX(s)\rightarrow M^+(aq)+X^-(aq)} \]
the chemical potential of the cation is \(\mu_+\) and that of the anion is \(\mu_-\)
The total molar Gibbs function of the solute
\[ G = \mu_+ + \mu_- \]
where
\[ \mu = \mu^* + RT\ln a \]
where \(\mu^*\) is the chemical potential of an ideal solution
Gibbs Function of Solution
Plugging the chemical activity into the Gibbs function
\[ G = \mu_+^* + RT \ln a_+ + \mu_-^* + RT\ln a_- \]
Using the molar definition of the activity coefficient \(a_i=\gamma_i m_i\)
\[ G = \mu_+^* + RT \ln \gamma_+m_+ + \mu_-^* + RT\ln \gamma_-m_- \]
\[ G = \mu_+^* + \mu_-^* + RT \ln \gamma_+m_+ + RT\ln \gamma_-m_- \]
\[ G = \mu_+^* + \mu_-^* + RT \ln \gamma_+m_+ \gamma_-m_- \]
\[ G = \mu_+^* + \mu_-^* + RT \ln m_+m_- + RT\ln \gamma_+\gamma_- \]
Mean Activity Coefficient
It is impossile to deconvolve the term into specfic contributions of the two ions
We use the geometric average to define the mean activity coefficient, \(\gamma_\pm = \sqrt{\gamma_+\gamma_-} \)
For a substance the dissociates according to
\[ \chem{M_xX_y(s)\rightarrow xM^{y+}(aq)+yX^{x-}(aq)} \]
the expression for the mean activity coefficient if given by
\[ \gamma_\pm = \left(\gamma_+^x\gamma_-^y\right)^{\bfrac{1}{x+y}} \]
Debeye-Hückel Law
In 1923, Debeye and Hückel suggested a means of calculating the mean activity coefficients from experimental data
\[ \log_{10}\gamma_\pm = \frac{1.824\times 10^6}{\left(\epsilon T\right)^\bfrac{3}{2}}\left| z_++z_-\right|\sqrt{I} \]
where \(\epsilon\) is the dielectric constant of the solvent, \(T\) is the temperature in K, \(z_+\) and \(z_-\) are the charges on the ions, and \(I\) is the ionic strength
\(I\) is given by
\[ I=\frac{1}{2}\frac{m_+z_+^2+m_-z_-^2}{m^\circ} \]